Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/10737
Title: Methodology of ijtihad of Salafi doctrine : comparative study and its relevance in Malaysia
Authors: Khairul Fahmi Jamaludin
Supervisor: Mohamad Asmadi Abdullah, Ph.D
Mohamad Sabri Zakaria, Ph.D
Afridah Abas, Ph.D
Subject: Salafiyah
Islam -- Doctrines
Year: 2021
Publisher: Kuala Lumpur : Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Law, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2021
Abstract in English: Salafi doctrine has become a phenomenal event nowadays. Its slogan of returning to Qur’an and Sunnah has tempted Muslims from various backgrounds and walks of life to follow this particular doctrine. Despite its benevolent intention, this call of Salafi doctrine seems to have issues with local madhab as well as religious authorities in Malaysia. This study focuses on the methodology of ijtihad of Salafi doctrine in khilafiyyah issues. The objective of the study is to examine the methodology of ijtihad of Salafi doctrine; comparing the methodology of ijtihad of Salafi doctrine with methodology of ijtihad of the Four madhabs; to scrutinize laws and fatwas related to Salafi doctrine; and to propose a suitable legal provision that is capable of governing as well as regulating this doctrine in order to maintain the harmony and unity of Muslim community in Malaysia. In doing so, interviews and questionnaires have been conducted by the researcher to test the hypothesis of the study. This study adopts a qualitative method that is most important for socio-legal research. Specifically, the qualitative research method collects data from various legal writings, writing of classical jurists of the Four madhabs, national laws, fatwa, etc. This study also uses in-depth semi-structured interviews as well as structured questionnaires to obtain data from the respondents. The findings of this study demonstrate that the methodology of ijtihad of Salafi doctrine is quite different from the methodology of ijtihad of Four madhabs where it employs literal approach in understanding and interpreting various Islamic sources. It also discovers that the fatwā related to Salafī doctrine does serve its purpose in educating the public and controlling the doctrine from confusing the public at large. Finally, this study reveals that the difference of methodology of ijtihād between the Salafi doctrine and the Four madhabs must be handled with utmost respect and care in order to avoid further complications in the future. The study, therefore, concludes by suggesting that there is a need to give legal effect to the existing fatwa and there is a need to propose a specific legal provision to govern and regulate the Salafi doctrine.
Call Number: t BPA 412 S2 K43 2021
Kullliyah: Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws
Programme: Doctor of Philosophy in Law
URI: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/10737
Appears in Collections:AIKOL Thesis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
t11100393298KhairulFahmiBinJamaludin_24.pdf24 pages file490.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
t11100393298KhairulFahmiBinJamaludin_SEC.pdf
  Restricted Access
Full text secured file4.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.