Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/1960
Title: The role of Judges in criminal trials: a comparative study of civil and common law approaches
Authors: Motilewa, Quadri Kafayat
Subject: Judges
Judicial process
Criminal procedure
Year: 2012
Publisher: Kuala Lumpur : Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, Interrnational Islamic University Malaysia, 2012
Abstract in English: The court of law is the last hope of the common man and it is required that justice does not serve the purpose of the State alone but should be justice for the accused person; justice for the victim and finally justice for the society at large. In the adversarial system, the criminal procedure does not allow the judge to descend into the arena unlike in the case of inquisitorial system where the judge is expected to talk and also walk i.e. he must inquest into the evidence and physically investigate matters as presented before him. A well-rounded judge will better serve the interest of justice than a judge that is subjected to jurisdictional approach of adjudication rather an open approach inclusive of best practices. This study employed the use of doctrinal research methodology which will involve mostly a theoretical and pure legal point of view. This research discusses the concepts of law and justice according to the positivist and naturalist traditions and how it relates to the AdversariaYCommon Law System and the InquisitoriaYCivil Law System. The role of judges in criminal trials was compared looking at the Malaysian and the French Criminal Systems with the aim of proffering best practices. The study also looked into the history of the jury system and how well a Common Law judge can function without a jury. The study found that the following mechanisms if properly managed and utilized will be a good fusion of best practices in any given jurisdiction and these practices include; the application of judicial precedent; the re-enactment of the jury system or the use of 2 or more judges in the court of first instance; the merging of a civil and criminal matter that have the same parties disputing on the same matter in both instances; oral submissions for inquisitorial proceedings; the eradication of secret trials; upholding the tenets of natural justice; and a better attitude towards openness and integration for the betterment of justice.
Degree Level: Master
Call Number: t K 2146 M918R 2012
Kullliyah: Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws
Programme: Masters of Comparative Laws
URI: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/1960
URL: https://lib.iium.edu.my/mom/services/mom/document/getFile/moFBoOPZvp4G3RWqYNMPOTjFqIT3KvSM20160301113127580
Appears in Collections:AIKOL Thesis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
t00011269999QuadriKafayat_SEC_24.pdf24 pages file1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
t00011269999QuadriKafayat_SEC.pdf
  Restricted Access
Full text secured file7.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on May 17, 2021

Download(s)

24
checked on May 17, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.