Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/1960
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMotilewa, Quadri Kafayaten_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T08:46:25Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-20T08:46:25Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.urihttp://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/1960-
dc.description.abstractThe court of law is the last hope of the common man and it is required that justice does not serve the purpose of the State alone but should be justice for the accused person; justice for the victim and finally justice for the society at large. In the adversarial system, the criminal procedure does not allow the judge to descend into the arena unlike in the case of inquisitorial system where the judge is expected to talk and also walk i.e. he must inquest into the evidence and physically investigate matters as presented before him. A well-rounded judge will better serve the interest of justice than a judge that is subjected to jurisdictional approach of adjudication rather an open approach inclusive of best practices. This study employed the use of doctrinal research methodology which will involve mostly a theoretical and pure legal point of view. This research discusses the concepts of law and justice according to the positivist and naturalist traditions and how it relates to the AdversariaYCommon Law System and the InquisitoriaYCivil Law System. The role of judges in criminal trials was compared looking at the Malaysian and the French Criminal Systems with the aim of proffering best practices. The study also looked into the history of the jury system and how well a Common Law judge can function without a jury. The study found that the following mechanisms if properly managed and utilized will be a good fusion of best practices in any given jurisdiction and these practices include; the application of judicial precedent; the re-enactment of the jury system or the use of 2 or more judges in the court of first instance; the merging of a civil and criminal matter that have the same parties disputing on the same matter in both instances; oral submissions for inquisitorial proceedings; the eradication of secret trials; upholding the tenets of natural justice; and a better attitude towards openness and integration for the betterment of justice.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKuala Lumpur : Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, Interrnational Islamic University Malaysia, 2012en_US
dc.rightsCopyright International Islamic University Malaysia-
dc.subject.lcshJudgesen_US
dc.subject.lcshJudicial processen_US
dc.subject.lcshCriminal procedureen_US
dc.titleThe role of Judges in criminal trials: a comparative study of civil and common law approachesen_US
dc.typeMaster Thesisen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://lib.iium.edu.my/mom/services/mom/document/getFile/moFBoOPZvp4G3RWqYNMPOTjFqIT3KvSM20160301113127580-
dc.description.identityt00011269999QuadriKafayaten_US
dc.description.identifierThe role of judges in criminal trials: a comparative study of civil and common law approaches /by Quadri Kafayat Motilewaen_US
dc.description.kulliyahAhmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Lawsen_US
dc.description.programmeMasters of Comparative Lawsen_US
dc.description.degreelevelMasteren_US
dc.description.callnumbert K 2146 M918R 2012en_US
dc.description.notesThesis (MCL)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2012.en_US
dc.description.physicaldescriptionxiii, 95 leaves :ill. ;30cm.en_US
item.openairetypeMaster Thesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:AIKOL Thesis
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
t00011269999QuadriKafayat_SEC_24.pdf24 pages file1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
t00011269999QuadriKafayat_SEC.pdf
  Restricted Access
Full text secured file7.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on May 17, 2021

Download(s)

24
checked on May 17, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.