Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/1701
Title: A socio-legal study on the conciliatory bodies appointed under section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 : the constraints and suggestions for reform
Authors: Nur Ezan binti Rahmat
Subject: Family mediation -- Malaysia
Dispute resolution (Law) -- Malaysia
Marriage law -- Malaysia
Year: 2017
Publisher: Kuala Lumpur : Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2017
Abstract in English: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is promoted because of its advantages over litigation. There are many branches of ADR, among others are arbitration, mediation, negotiation, and conciliation. This study focuses on conciliation and reconciliation of matrimonial disputes handled by the Marriage Tribunal as a conciliatory body appointed under section 106 of Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976. The objective of this study is to analyze the problems faced by conciliatory bodies in terms of effectiveness, competency, enforcement and impact on the target groups. Another objective is to study the process of family mediation as practised in Australia, Singapore and New Zealand to be as models of reference. In order to prove the hypothesis, a special study has been carried out and questionnaires have been distributed to the respondents. This study adopts both qualitative and quantitative methods that are necessary for a socio-legal research. The qualitative method draws data from the principles, legal writings, legislations, Malaysian family laws, case law, and foreign family laws. The quantitative method employs the statistical tool, i.e, Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows Program Version 17.0 for data analysis. Two statistical procedures namely descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the empirical data. The findings of this study prove that although majority of the respondents are quite satisfied with the reconciliation sessions and officers in charge, it still fails to reconcile the disputing parties. It indicates that the reconciliation process handled by the conciliatory body appointed by the government under the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 is not effective. Therefore, there is a need for the practice and the relevant law to be improved. This study has also examined the practice of family mediation in other jurisdictions which could be the model in order to establish family mediation in Malaysia.
Degree Level: Doctoral
Call Number: t d10 KPG 3755 N974S 2017
Kullliyah: Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws
Programme: Doctor of Philosophy in Law
URI: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/1701
URL: https://lib.iium.edu.my/mom/services/mom/document/getFile/1rftVIGvZvS3Uj0Y6IucYz94h4uVqyeo20170811153354377
Appears in Collections:AIKOL Thesis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
t11100361389NurEzanRahmat_SEC_24.pdf24 pages file1.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
t11100361389NurEzanRahmat_SEC.pdf
  Restricted Access
Full text secured file7.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on May 17, 2021

Download(s)

22
checked on May 17, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.