Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/11115
Title: Formalising the concept of restorative justice within the Saudi criminal justice system : a legal analysis
Authors: Talal A, Alzahrani Somih
Supervisor: Ramizah Wan Muhammad, Ph.D
Mohd. Iqbal Abdul Wahab, Ph.D
Subject: Criminal Procedure (Islamic law)
Restorative justice -- Saudi Arabia
Criminals -- Rehabilitation
Year: 2021
Publisher: Kuala Lumpur : Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Law, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2021
Abstract in English: Restorative justice (hereinafter referred to as RJ) concept is recognised and practised globally; many legal systems have begun to recognise the principles of RJ four decades ago. Meanwhile, the Saudi legal system which derives its authority from Shari'ah recognises and implements many principles of RJ since the establishment of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Shari'ah practices such as reconciliation, mediation, intercession, mercy, forgiveness, pardon, compensation and others are implemented in the Saudi criminal justice system; however, the concept of RJ is not recognised per se. Therefore, the objective of this research is to investigate the principles and practices already implemented in the Saudi criminal justice system that are of an RJ nature, and to introduce them to be recognised as "Restorative Justice system-نظام العدالة الإصلاحية". Moreover, it aims to examine New Zealand and Canadian RJ practices to adopt potential approaches within Saudi criminal justice system as experienced and practised in those countries. The research depends on doctrinal and non-doctrinal, namely empirical, research methodologies; the doctrinal is based on primary and secondary sources of Shari'ah, legal systems, and case laws/judicial rulings of Saudi, Canada, and New Zealand. The empirical study depends on in-depth and semi-structured interviews with judges and reconciliation officers from Saudi. Undoubtedly, RJ is practised as a prime method within the Saudi criminal system; however, it is lacking essential tools to be fully implemented as it is practised in other systems. These tools are the alternative sentences which were suspended in 2015 due to lack of mechanism to regulate the practice of these alternatives. From the experience of New Zealand and Canada, contracting with private service providers is one of the solutions to facilitate the implementation of RJ practices. Adopting an RJ framework within the Saudi judicial system is going to have a significant impact in acknowledging, at the international level, the remarkable practices and efforts of the Saudi judicial system in dealing with crimes restoratively.
Call Number: t BPK 333 T35 2021
Kullliyah: Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws
Programme: Doctor of Philosophy (Law)
URI: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/11115
Appears in Collections:AIKOL Thesis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
t11100429175AlzahraniSomihTalalA_24.pdf24 pages file448.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
t11100429175AlzahraniSomihTalalA_SEC.pdf
  Restricted Access
Full text secured file3.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.