Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/9510
Title: | نفاذ وتنفيذ القرارات الإدارية بدولة الكويت : دراسة مقارنة مع فرنسا ومصر | Transliterated Titles: | Nafadh wa-tanfidh al-qararat al-idariyah bi-dawlah al-Kuwayt : dirasah muqaranah ma’a Faransa wa-Misr | Authors: | عجمي، محمد راشد Ajmi, Mohammad R.H.M |
Supervisor: | Laeba, Muhammad, Ph.D Badruddin Hj Ibrahim, Ph.D |
Subject: | Administrative law -- Kuwait Administrative law -- France Administrative law -- Egypt |
Year: | 2019 | Publisher: | Kuala Lumpur : Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Law, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2019 | Abstract in English: | The study aimed to define the concept of decision by reviewing definitions in jurisprudence and judiciary to distinguish administrative decisions and similar works related to it. This study highlighted the structures, characteristics and types of administrative decisions by studying the literal and terminological meaning of enforcement and execution concept. The study also analyzed the administrative decisions procedures in dealing with administration and individuals as well as mechanisms to inform and justify the administrative decisions before the determined period of execution. The study explored the implementations of enforcement and execution of administrative decisions in the laws and regulations of Kuwait, France and Egypt by examining administrative decisions in rules and regulation of these countries. The study used both the descriptive analytical approach and comparative and applied methodology. This study has found that both Kuwaiti and Egyptian legislators, like many legislators in other countries, do not define the administrative decision; they leave it to the discretionary power of both jurisprudence and judiciary, although the administrative judiciary of Kuwait and Egypt agree on a unified definition. The study highlighted there is a difference in jurisprudence and judiciary in determining the elements of the administrative decision and that some of them are unclear between the elements of the decision and the conditions of its validity due to the difference on defining the concept of administrative decision. It also shows similar stand among these countries regarding laws related with enforcement and execution of administrative decisions. | Degree Level: | Doctoral | Call Number: | t d57 KMN 272 A312N 2019 | Kullliyah: | Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws | Programme: | Doctor of Philosophy (Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws) | URI: | http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/9510 |
Appears in Collections: | AIKOL Thesis |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
t11100408699MohammadR.H.M.Alajmi_24.pdf | 780.91 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
t11100408699MohammadR.H.M.Alajmi_SEC.pdf Restricted Access | Full text Sec file | 2.52 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Page view(s)
174
checked on May 17, 2021
Download(s)
88
checked on May 17, 2021
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.