Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/9231
Title: | منهج الامام المنذري في توظيف احاديث الترغيب والترهيب تربويا :دراسة حديثية نقدية | Transliterated Titles: | Manhaj al-imam al-mundhiri fi tawzif ahadith al-targhib wa al-tarhib tarbawiya :Dirasat hadithiyah naqdiyah | Authors: | عباس,تاج الدين أحمد سعيد 'Abbas, Taj al-Din Ahmad Sa'id |
Subject: | Mundhiri, 'Abd al-'Azim ibn 'Abd al-Qawi, -- 1185-1258. -- Targhib wa-al-tarhib Hadith -- Selections, extracts, etc. Hadith -- Collected works |
Year: | 2015 | Publisher: | Kuala Lumpur :Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2015 | Abstract in English: | This study intends to identify the significance of weak hadith (Hadith Al-dhaif) in the books of previous Muslim scholars as they deduced it based on certain rules which are known to them. One of them is Imam al Mundhiri who was very well-versed in the science of hadith and a prominent scholar of his time. The study also attempts to identify the methodology used by Imam al Mundhiri in his book titled Al-Targheeb wal-Tarheeb, especially in dealing with 2,052 weak hadith. In order to achieve this, the study attempts to answer the following questions: Is it permissible to use any type of weak hadith? Did the first generation of scholars of hadith differentiate between weak and very weak hadith in terms of deducing them especially in matters involving exhorting and warning? Is there any difference between very weak hadith and fabricated ones as defined by early and modern generations of scholars? Why did Imam al Mundhiri mention one fabricated hadith in his book in spite of it being a rejected hadith based on the consensus of scholars? The study has come up with several important results which indicate that the first generation of hadith scholars relied on weak hadith in deciding on rulings in the absence of authentic hadith, particularly in the case of exhorting and warning. This is the standard viewpoint of the majority of scholars, if not the viewpoint of all; therefore, those who attempt to disqualify the weak hadith in general have no evidence, and we should not pay any serious attention to their views. Those that have differed, their differences were just based on the issue of criticism and justification which depended upon lenient, moderate and strict approaches, consequently, it had left a very huge impact on the degree of the weakness of hadith, differing from minor to major. By taking the above situation into consideration, the study concludes that there is no harm in making inferences from weak hadith even if it is an isolated case; however, it should be classified according to the preferred conditions of acceptance of hadith, hence, the definition of hadith al dhaif should be verified terminologically which not only denotes comprehensiveness of this term, but also gives due rights to the statements of the scholars in view of their unanimity. | Degree Level: | Doctoral | Call Number: | t BPA 272 A23 2015 | Kullliyah: | Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences | Programme: | Doctor of Philosophy in Qur'an Sunnah. | URI: | http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/9231 | URL: | https://lib.iium.edu.my/mom/services/mom/document/getFile/EmVThyI2cLKAWOGZAWLNkXwbpKNSEzms20180313155629364 |
Appears in Collections: | KIRKHS Thesis |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
t11100355484Tajal-DinAhmadSa'idAbbas_SEC_24.pdf | 24 pages file | 302.15 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
t11100355484Tajal-DinAhmadSa'idAbbas_SEC.pdf Restricted Access | Full text secured file | 2.82 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Page view(s)
14
checked on May 18, 2021
Download(s)
32
checked on May 18, 2021
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.