Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/8180
Title: حرّية الرأي والتعبير في مصر وفرنسا: دراسة تطبيقية مقارنة بالشريعة الإسلامية
Transliterated Titles: Hurriyat al-ra`yu wa-al-ta`bir fi Misr wa Fransa: dirasah tatbiqiyah maqaranah bi-al-shari`ah al-Islamiyah
Authors: محمد علي (الصقار)، محمد محمد عباس
Muhammad `Ali (al-Saqar), Muhammad Muhammad `Abbas
Year: 2019
Publisher: Kuala Lumpur : Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2019
Abstract in English: This research aims to highlight that the right to freedom of opinion and expression is inherent to the human being and is the cornerstone of other rights and freedoms. It purposes to show the position of Islamic law and its precedent in recognizing and protecting this right over other conventional laws. As well as to identify the deficiencies in the French and Egyptian laws in the field of codification of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. However, the problematic statement of this research tends to address is whether the applications of the right to freedom of opinion and expression in French and Egyptian law are compatible with their legal theories. Or is there a contradiction and duplication of standards at the applied level? What is the extent of the theorization and application of the two laws with Islamic law? This is done through the use of the inductive method: to extrapolate laws relating to freedom of opinion and expression, as well as the provisions of Islamic law and opinions of jurists in the same subject. Comparative approach is used to highlight the similarities and differences between the laws of Egypt, France and Islamic law in establishing and exercising the right to freedom of opinion and expression. This study reached several conclusions, the most important of which are: Islam is the pioneer in introducing the concepts of freedoms and human rights and guarantee them before Western civilization and the world knew these concepts. It is found that French law included contradictions and duplication in the application of freedom of opinion and expression. Especially the right of freedom of belief, practice of religion and freedom of information with Muslims, as well as Egyptian law with opponents of the regime specifically. The researcher recommended several recommendations, the most important of which are: Calling on the current secularists in the Islamic countries in general and in Egypt in particular to look impartially and scientifically to the freedom of opinion and expression in Islamic law and compare it with all the existing old and new laws. Intellectuals, jurists, scholars and elders of Islam must clarify the greatness of Islam in the freedom of opinion and expression in a simple and clear way by all means available to them. Inviting scholars and thinkers of the Islamic Ummah to contribute to the intellectual awareness of the community through submitting projects and proposals calling for adherence to the controls of freedom of expression in Islam. Finally, to create a parallel media to the current media, adopting the principles and objectives of the Islamic media.
Degree Level: Master
Kullliyah: Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws
Programme: Master of Comparative Law
URI: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/8180
URL: https://lib.iium.edu.my/mom/services/mom/document/getFile/7RriuVZP2Bjzzt0SqUwN3s2Cook3iejD20200316093330214
Appears in Collections:AIKOL Thesis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
t11100414339MohamedMohamedAbbasMohamedAli_SEC_24.pdf24 pages file839.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
t11100414339MohamedMohamedAbbasMohamedAli_SEC.pdf
  Restricted Access
Full text secured file2.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

106
checked on May 17, 2021

Download(s)

80
checked on May 17, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.