Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/8160
Title: الأثر القانوني المترتب على الحنث في اليمين الدستورية في العراق: دراسة تحليلية تقويمية
Transliterated Titles: al-Athar al-qanuni al-mutarattib `ala al-hinth fi al-Yaman al-dusturiyah fi al-`Iraq (dirasat tahliliyah taqwimiyah)
Authors: سطم، علي جديع عفر
Satam, `Ali Jadi` `Afar
Subject: Constitutional law -- Iraq
Year: 2018
Publisher: Kuala Lumpur : Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2018
Abstract in English: This study aims to identify the legal effect on the violation of the constitutional oath in Iraq. The study explains the concept of constitutional oath, its classifications and the difference between constitution of oath and other types of oath. The study also describes its legal provisions according to time and place of implementation, and its wordings. The problem statement of this study is that most constitutions in Islamic and non-Islamic countries make it obligatory for senior positions in the state, such as the president of the state to swear by the constitutional oath before starting their duties. However, most constitutions do not indicate any legal effect or penalty for refraining from fulfilling the constitutional oath. The researcher examines Iraqi constitutions as well as the constitutions of Islamic and non-Islamic countries within the subject of constitutional oath. To achieve the objectives of this study, the researcher adopts the analytical descriptive method and critical approach through the review of well-known constitutions such as American constitution. In addition to that, the researcher also uses the comparative approach to compare between the constitutions and the Shariah. The result of the study reveals that all successive Iraqi constitutions and the constitutions of Arab, Islamic and Western countries do not regulate legal responsibility for refraining from fulfilling the constitutional oaths except the constitution of Iraq 2005 which stipulates the responsibility of the president of Iraq for refraining from executing the constitutional oath without indicating any penalty against the president, legislative and executive body. That responsibility is not completed if the law that regulates the mechanism of accountability to the president of the republic is not legislated. The researcher suggests that a reform has to take place on the wording of the provisions related to constitutional oath in the present constitution of Iraq. The study recommends to inclusion of a legal effect in the provisions of the constitution to establish a legal penalty and accountability on the president of republic, the members of legislative body and the officials in the government if they refrain from executing the constitutional oath. This legal effect should include all parties and members assigned to take the constitutional oath within the principles of Shariah.
Degree Level: Doctoral
Call Number: t d51 KMJ 2064.5 S253A 2018
Kullliyah: Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws
Programme: Doctor of Philosophy in Law.
URI: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/8160
URL: https://lib.iium.edu.my/mom/services/mom/document/getFile/R2WvfEVaZgFvSC10AFPvvQFPpB4yQruw20181016162329923
Appears in Collections:AIKOL Thesis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
t11100385746Satam'AliJadi''Afar_SEC_24.pdf24 pages file463.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
t11100385746Satam'AliJadi''Afar_SEC (1).pdf
  Restricted Access
Full text secured file1.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on May 17, 2021

Download(s)

48
checked on May 17, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.