Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/4300
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatchanee, Nasneenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T11:07:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-20T11:07:00Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/4300-
dc.description.abstractResearchers have been investigating various factors for differences in academic achievement among students besides the emphasis on cognitive intelligence. In fact, it has been found that academic achievement is not determined by cognitive intelligence alone. Among the factors that are thought to contribute to students’ success and academic achievement is thinking style. It stems from the belief that people have similar patterns in governing themselves just like society does. Studies have shown that people have different thinking styles – legislative, executive, and judicial style which do affect the way they prefer to do their tasks. Legislative style is considered as creative thinking, executive style is viewed as following instruction, and judicial style is represented as critical thinking. It has been found that students from Islamic private schools in southern Thailand, in general, do not perform well in public examinations. Hence, this study investigated the thinking styles of three categories of students and their relationship to academic achievement. Three groups of academic achievers among students from 3 selected Islamic private schools in Nakhonsrithammarat – in upper southern Thailand were identified as the sample. It comprised 158 grade ten students and the three groups were classified into low achievers (N=36), average achievers (N=102), and high achievers (N=20) based on the Ordinary National Educational Test (O-NET) score. The sample was obtained using stratified random sampling for low and average achievers while purposive sampling was used for high achievers. The descriptive statistics, multiple regression analysis, and Sternberg’s interpretation of the MSG scores were used in analyzing the data. The results reveal that the executive style was the predominant thinking style exhibited by all groups of academic achievers. Additionally, the judiciary style was the prevailing thinking style displayed by male students while the executive style was the most noticeable style presented by female students. Furthermore, only the legislative thinking style was found to be an indicator towards students’ levels of academic achievement. However, it was a weak one.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKuala Lumpur :International Islamic University Malaysia,2018en_US
dc.rightsCopyright International Islamic University Malaysia
dc.subject.lcshIslamic education -- Thailand, Southernen_US
dc.subject.lcshStudents, Muslim -- Thailand, Southernen_US
dc.subject.lcshAcademic achievement -- Thailand, Southernen_US
dc.titleAcademic achievement and thinking styles among grade ten students in selected Islamic private schools in southern Thailanden_US
dc.typeMaster Thesisen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://lib.iium.edu.my/mom/services/mom/document/getFile/Imme8MGfzXMDH8Qo7goLJMwENm7pUTDQ20190725121547649-
dc.description.identityt11100379576Nasneenen_US
dc.description.identifierThesis : Academic achievement and thinking styles among grade ten students in selected Islamic private schools in southern Thailand /by Nasneen Patchaneeen_US
dc.description.kulliyahKulliyyah of Educationen_US
dc.description.programmeMaster in Education.en_US
dc.description.degreelevelMasteren_US
dc.description.callnumbert BPL 65 T544 2017en_US
dc.description.notesThesis (MED)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2018.en_US
dc.description.physicaldescriptionxiii, 142 leaves :|billustrations ;|c30cm.en_US
item.openairetypeMaster Thesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:KOED Thesis
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
t11100379576Nasneen_SEC_24.pdf24 pages file767.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
t11100379576Nasneen_SEC.pdf
  Restricted Access
Full text secured file2.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on May 18, 2021

Download(s)

26
checked on May 18, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.