Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/2290
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHanna Rabittah Zaharinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T09:44:36Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-20T09:44:36Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.urihttp://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/2290-
dc.description.abstractTakaful and insurance have been compared long ago by many scholars around the world. Prior literatures of Takaful are mainly focusing on the concept and theoretical nature of takaful and its differences from insurance. Malaysian Takaful industry has been given flexibility in terms of the operational models adopted and to the researchers` knowledge; no research has been conducted in Malaysia regarding the choice ofTakaful operational models by Takaful operators. It is important to study the motives behind choosing among different Takaful models since different models have different impacts on the Takaful funds, especially for Family Takaful funds. Therefore, this research is conducted to examine on reasons behind choosing Takaful operation models and to propose the most suitable model to be adopted by Takaful operators to be fair and equitable for both Takaful operators and participants. The representatives from Takaful operators are interviewed and it has been found out that most of Takaful operators prefer the Hybrid wakE!ahMulErabah or Modified wakE!ah (principal-agent) model. The main reason is that Central Bank of Malaysia clearly sets the rule that in the wakElah contract, Takaful operators can charge wakElah fess (agent fees and administrative expenses) upfront to the participants (certificate holders). Moreover, an upper limit wakE!ah fees is 40% and hence, it is favourable to Takaful operators. The Muli:rabah (profit and loss sharing) model is not much favoured in the Malaysian Takaful industry. Interview results further find out that most of the practitioners also think that the wakE!ah fees imposed on the participants are too much and the Hybrid wakE!ah/MulErabah Modified wakE!ah model has too many layers of charging profits from the funds and consequently, the currently adopted models are at the disadvantages of participants. Since this research provides a clear picture of the current practice of the Family Takaful operating models adopted by the Malaysian Takaful operators, these findings will be useful for regulators and SharENah advisors to look into this issue again to be fair and justice to involved partiesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKuala Lumpur : International Islamic University Malaysia, 2012en_US
dc.rightsCopyright International Islamic University Malaysia
dc.subject.lcshInsurance -- Religious aspects -- Islamen_US
dc.subject.lcshInsurance -- Malaysiaen_US
dc.titleCritical Analysis of Family Takaful Operational Models in Malaysiaen_US
dc.typeMaster Thesisen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://lib.iium.edu.my/mom/services/mom/document/getFile/sWSlPXNMBXXgw0JELgfEZumxrmcdGlyn20151029111717859-
dc.description.identityt11100339913HannaRabittahen_US
dc.description.identifierThesis : Critical Analysis of Family Takaful Operational Models in Malaysia /by Hanna Rabittah Zaharinen_US
dc.description.kulliyahIIUM Institute of Islamic Banking and Financeen_US
dc.description.programmeMaster of Science in Islamic Banking and Financeen_US
dc.description.degreelevelMasteren_US
dc.description.callnumbert HG 8057 H243C 2012en_US
dc.description.notesThesis (MIIBF)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2012en_US
dc.description.physicaldescriptionx, 62 leaves :ill. ;30cm.en_US
item.openairetypeMaster Thesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:IIBF Thesis
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
t11100339913HannaRabittah_SEC_24.pdf24 pages file679.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
t11100339913HannaRabittah_SEC.pdf
  Restricted Access
Full text secured file1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

78
checked on May 19, 2021

Download(s)

46
checked on May 19, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.