Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/1612
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNedjar, Bachiren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T08:43:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-20T08:43:28Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/1612-
dc.description.abstractTrade transactions depend primarily on trust and prompt service. It is recognized that the carriage of goods by the sea plays a vital role to promote such features by being the most preferred choice compared to air or railroad transportation. However, the existing law-rules that regulate the international trade could not keep up with these features. The carrier under the Hague-Visby Rules has many opportunities to exempt himself from liability for loss or damage to the cargo in several cases. In addition, the Hague-Visby Rules suffers from the lack of uniformity in the interpretation regarding these exclusionary provisions in different jurisdictions. Such problems have resulted in the carrier’s dilution of responsibility, and the fortification of his immunity against the cargo-owner’s position. In an attempt to create a fairer balance between the carrier and the cargo interest, UNCITRAL has enacted an alternative legal instrument known as, Rotterdam Rules, to promote the international trade law in general, and to provide global uniformity in the application of the rules to the carriage of goods by sea, in particular with respect to enhancing the carrier’s liability. This study compares the application of both rules to the carrier’s liability; it elaborates the major obligations of the carrier against the cargo owner. However, it submits that the higher liability of the carriers and ship-owners, led the majority of the powerful industrial countries to ignore the ratification of the Rotterdam Rules and to maintain the application of the Hague/Hague-Visby Rules. In view of these circumstances, this study has revealed an imminent need for ratification the Rotterdam Rules to establish a suitable and effective set of rules to revive maritime law and to promote international trade, particularly, in terms of solving the shipping conflicts between the carriers and the cargo-interests. Finally, the study proposes that all countries should focus their efforts to make necessary improvements to ensure that they are in a position to ratify the Rotterdam Rules in the nearest future for the purpose of establishing international uniformity for multimodal transport.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKuala Lumpur : Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2017en_US
dc.rightsCopyright International Islamic University Malaysia
dc.subject.lcshBills of ladingen_US
dc.subject.lcshContracts, Maritimeen_US
dc.subject.lcshCarriers -- Law and legislationen_US
dc.titleA comparative analysis o the Hague-Visby Rules and the Rotterdam Rules with reference to carrier`s liabilittiesen_US
dc.typeMaster Thesisen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://lib.iium.edu.my/mom/services/mom/document/getFile/aO7zJSivcnXapZEyuDYqsIMaC1nmgHSj20180321105916293-
dc.description.identityt11100379923BachirNedjaren_US
dc.description.identifierThesis : A comparative analysis o the Hague-Visby Rules and the Rotterdam Rules with reference to carrier`s liabilitties /by Bachir Nedjaren_US
dc.description.kulliyahAhmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Lawsen_US
dc.description.programmeMaster of Comparative Lawsen_US
dc.description.degreelevelMasteren_US
dc.description.callnumbert d27 K 1178 N371C 2017en_US
dc.description.notesThesis (MCL)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2017.en_US
dc.description.physicaldescriptionxvii, 134 leaves :illustrations ;30cm.en_US
item.openairetypeMaster Thesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:AIKOL Thesis
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
t11100379923BachirNedjar_SEC_24.pdf24 pages file559.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
t11100379923BachirNedjar_SEC.pdf
  Restricted Access
Full text secured file1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

78
checked on May 17, 2021

Download(s)

692
checked on May 17, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Please give due acknowledgement and credits to the original authors and IIUM where applicable. No items shall be used for commercialization purposes except with written consent from the author.